Skip to content

Ensure BtServiceNode respects constructor service name when XML port is empty#5990

Merged
SteveMacenski merged 1 commit intoros-navigation:mainfrom
mini-1235:fix/bt_service_node
Feb 27, 2026
Merged

Ensure BtServiceNode respects constructor service name when XML port is empty#5990
SteveMacenski merged 1 commit intoros-navigation:mainfrom
mini-1235:fix/bt_service_node

Conversation

@mini-1235
Copy link
Collaborator


Basic Info

Info Please fill out this column
Ticket(s) this addresses N/A
Primary OS tested on Ubuntu
Robotic platform tested on (Steve's Robot, gazebo simulation of Tally, hardware turtlebot)
Does this PR contain AI generated software? (No; Yes and it is marked inline in the code)
Was this PR description generated by AI software? Out of respect for maintainers, AI for human-to-human communications are banned

Description of contribution in a few bullet points

Description of documentation updates required from your changes

Description of how this change was tested


Future work that may be required in bullet points

For Maintainers:

  • Check that any new parameters added are updated in docs.nav2.org
  • Check that any significant change is added to the migration guide
  • Check that any new features OR changes to existing behaviors are reflected in the tuning guide
  • Check that any new functions have Doxygen added
  • Check that any new features have test coverage
  • Check that any new plugins is added to the plugins page
  • If BT Node, Additionally: add to BT's XML index of nodes for groot, BT package's readme table, and BT library lists
  • Should this be backported to current distributions? If so, tag with backport-*.

…is empty

Signed-off-by: mini-1235 <mauricepurnawan@gmail.com>
@mini-1235
Copy link
Collaborator Author

#4859 introduces a subtle bug: when the xml port is empty, the constructor service name gets overridden with an empty string, this service name is later used for creating service

@SteveMacenski SteveMacenski merged commit eed33e8 into ros-navigation:main Feb 27, 2026
15 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants