Hello!

Feature request

The current implementation of the LifecycleManager only allows to transition all the nodes from unconfigured to active which causes some issues in certain cases at startup for the system we are working on. If one would add the transition from unconfigured to inactive as "CONFIGURE" would you approve such contribution? Or is there some problem with that which I have not been able to see?

Feature description

Add a CONFIGURE transition to the LifecycleManager which transitions all the managed nodes from unconfigured to inactive state.

Implementation considerations

Requires:

• Adding a new command to ManageLifecycleNodes.srv eg. uint8 CONFIGURE = 5
• Handle the case in the lifecycle_manager.cpp