Summary
- What does this package do? (explain in 50 words or less):
This package provides a wrapper around the patentsview api, which serves USPTO patent data that has been disambiguated. There is one main function to search and download data from the API (search_pv) and several other helper functions.
- Paste the full DESCRIPTION file inside a code block below:
Package: patentsview
Type: Package
Title: An R Client to the PatentsView API
Version: 0.1.0.9000
Authors@R: person("Christopher", "Baker", email = "chriscrewbaker@gmail.com",
role = c("aut", "cre"))
Encoding: UTF-8
Description: Provides functions to simplify the PatentsView API
(http://www.patentsview.org/api/doc.html) query language,
send GET and POST requests to the API's seven endpoints, and parse the data
that comes back.
URL: https://github.com/crew102/patentsview
BugReports: https://github.com/crew102/patentsview/issues
License: GPL-2
LazyData: TRUE
Depends:
R (>= 3.1)
Imports:
httr,
jsonlite,
utils
Suggests:
knitr,
rmarkdown,
testthat
VignetteBuilder: knitr
RoxygenNote: 6.0.1
-
URL for the package (the development repository, not a stylized html page):
master branch on github
-
Who is the target audience?
Researchers who want to interact with patent data. There are several specific use cases of patent data that have been listed in this thread of the rOpenSci discussion board.
-
Are there other R packages that accomplish the same thing? If so, what is different about yours?
I know of two R packages that one can use to download patent data: lensr and a development version of opsr. lensr is the most similar, as it can be used to download USPTO patent data. I do not know of any other packages that wrap patentsview, which is the only service that provides USPTO data that has been disambiguated.
Requirements
Confirm each of the following by checking the box. This package:
Publication options
Detail
R CMD check passes with one warning regarding this being my first package submission.
I believe the package follows the guidelines, but there are a few items I would like to highlight. These may or may not be issues:
- The README does not follow the exact same format as described in the packaging guidelines.
- I have added a cran-comment.md file which I plan on updating before submitting to CRAN.
- I have not tagged the git repo yet, as I would like to wait for feedback before considering this version complete.
-
If this is a resubmission following rejection, please explain the change in circumstances:
-
If possible, please provide recommendations of reviewers - those with experience with similar packages and/or likely users of your package - and their GitHub user names:
Summary
This package provides a wrapper around the patentsview api, which serves USPTO patent data that has been disambiguated. There is one main function to search and download data from the API (
search_pv) and several other helper functions.URL for the package (the development repository, not a stylized html page):
master branch on github
Who is the target audience?
Researchers who want to interact with patent data. There are several specific use cases of patent data that have been listed in this thread of the rOpenSci discussion board.
Are there other R packages that accomplish the same thing? If so, what is different about yours?
I know of two R packages that one can use to download patent data: lensr and a development version of opsr.
lensris the most similar, as it can be used to download USPTO patent data. I do not know of any other packages that wrap patentsview, which is the only service that provides USPTO data that has been disambiguated.Requirements
Confirm each of the following by checking the box. This package:
Publication options
paper.mdwith a high-level description in the package root or ininst/.Detail
R CMD check(ordevtools::check()) succeed? Paste and describe any errors or warnings:R CMD checkpasses with one warning regarding this being my first package submission.I believe the package follows the guidelines, but there are a few items I would like to highlight. These may or may not be issues:
If this is a resubmission following rejection, please explain the change in circumstances:
If possible, please provide recommendations of reviewers - those with experience with similar packages and/or likely users of your package - and their GitHub user names: