Rooch framework v25#3842
Merged
Merged
Conversation
- Remove sender_addr != receiver_addr assertion in internal_open_channel - Remove sender == receiver validation in CLI open command - Add comment explaining same address usage for account internal operations - Add test case verifying sender == receiver functionality works
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.Scanned FilesNone |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR introduces Rooch Framework v25, which includes significant enhancements to the payment channel infrastructure, resource management, and DID validation. The key changes include removing the restriction that prevented payment channels from having the same sender and receiver address, adding comprehensive security review documentation, and updating framework release notes.
Key Changes
- Removed sender/receiver equality check in payment channel to allow same-address operations
- Added extensive security review documentation (4 comprehensive reports)
- Updated framework release notes for v25
- Added new test coverage for same-address payment channel scenarios
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 13 out of 18 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
frameworks/rooch-framework/sources/payment_channel.move |
Removed assertion preventing same sender/receiver address, added clarifying comment |
frameworks/rooch-framework/sources/tests/payment_channel_test.move |
Added test case for same-address payment channel operations |
crates/rooch/src/commands/payment_channel/commands/open.rs |
Removed CLI validation that prevented same sender/receiver |
frameworks/framework-release/released/README.md |
Added v25 release notes link |
frameworks/framework-release/released/25/README.md |
Comprehensive v25 release documentation |
reports/security-review-report.md |
Detailed security analysis of DID and payment channel modules |
reports/test-coverage-analysis.md |
Test coverage analysis with recommendations |
reports/final-review-checklist.md |
Security review checklist with 41 items |
reports/SUMMARY.md |
Executive summary of security review |
reports/README.md |
Chinese language summary of security review |
deps/x402, deps/nuwa, deps/NIPs |
Submodule commit references |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Summary about this PR