Skip to content

Fixed #367 with eager implicit some#368

Merged
kvark merged 1 commit into
ron-rs:masterfrom
juntyr:367-eager-implicit-some
Feb 25, 2022
Merged

Fixed #367 with eager implicit some#368
kvark merged 1 commit into
ron-rs:masterfrom
juntyr:367-eager-implicit-some

Conversation

@juntyr

@juntyr juntyr commented Feb 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fix #367 by moving the implicit_some unwrap check after an eager check for Some(..)

  • I've included my change in CHANGELOG.md

@juntyr juntyr self-assigned this Feb 24, 2022
@juntyr

juntyr commented Feb 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I will wait to merge this PR until tomorrow evening so I can have a fresh look then

@juntyr juntyr force-pushed the 367-eager-implicit-some branch from dbb1c04 to 8cb33d1 Compare February 24, 2022 13:04
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Feb 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.52%. Comparing base (525484c) to head (8cb33d1).
Report is 111 commits behind head on master.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #368      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.20%   89.52%   +0.32%     
==========================================
  Files          46       47       +1     
  Lines        5056     5157     +101     
==========================================
+ Hits         4510     4617     +107     
+ Misses        546      540       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kvark kvark merged commit 46aa515 into ron-rs:master Feb 25, 2022
@juntyr juntyr deleted the 367-eager-implicit-some branch February 25, 2022 04:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unexpected behaviour of implicit_some

3 participants