-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 258
fix: update Dockerfile comments to reflect Python 3.12 usage #444
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe base Docker image in the Dockerfile was updated from Python 3.9 slim to Python 3.12 slim. No other modifications were made to the Dockerfile or to any public or exported entities. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)No sequence diagram is generated as the changes are limited to Docker base image updates and do not affect control flow or introduce new features. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
enforcer/Dockerfile (1)
1-2: Pin the exact patch tag (or use an ARG) to avoid non-deterministic rebuilds.
python:3.12-slimtracks the latest 3.12.x and can introduce unexpected changes or CVE regressions on every rebuild. Consider pinning to an exact patch tag or introducing a build ARG so you can bump it deliberately.-# Use the official Python 3.12 slim image as the base image -FROM python:3.12-slim +# Use the official Python 3.12.3 slim image as the base image (pin patch for repeatable builds) +ARG PYTHON_VERSION=3.12.3-slim +FROM python:${PYTHON_VERSION}Dockerfile (1)
1-2: Same reproducibility concern—pin or parameterise the patch version.For multi-stage builds this is even more important, as downstream cache busting becomes expensive.
-# Use the official Python 3.12 slim image as the base image -FROM python:3.12-slim AS builder +# Use the official Python 3.12.3 slim image as the base image +ARG PYTHON_VERSION=3.12.3-slim +FROM python:${PYTHON_VERSION} AS builder
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Dockerfile(1 hunks)enforcer/Dockerfile(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
enforcer/Dockerfile (1)
1-1: Comment text now correctly reflects the 3.12 base – looks good.
Nothing else to change here.Dockerfile (1)
1-1: Comment updated to Python 3.12 – all set.
The documentation now matches the actual image tag.
aantn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Title: Fix Dockerfile comments to reflect actual Python version
Description:
This PR fixes outdated comments in Dockerfiles that still referenced Python 3.9 while the actual base images were already using Python 3.12.
Changes:
Dockerfilefrom "Python 3.9 slim" to "Python 3.12 slim"enforcer/Dockerfilefrom "Python 3.9 slim" to "Python 3.12 slim"Type: Documentation fix