Enhance documentation for secrets_providers workflow blocks #1892
+5
−1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Updated LONG_DESCRIPTION and Field() descriptions for all blocks in the secrets_providers subdirectory, improving clarity, usability, and providing comprehensive explanations of functionalities, configuration options, and common use cases.
|
|
grzegorz-roboflow
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated LONG_DESCRIPTION and Field() descriptions for all blocks in the secrets providers subdirectory, improving clarity, usability, and providing comprehensive explanations of functionalities, configuration options, and common use cases.
List any dependencies that are required for this change.
N/A
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
How has this change been tested, please provide a testcase or example of how you tested the change?
Tested on local inference mkdocs server
Any specific deployment considerations
N/A
Docs