feat(memory): add skills-index.md registry for O(1) skill lookup#1224
Conversation
Implements the Skills Index Registry (PRD from issue #581) providing: - Central registry of 345 skills across 34 domains - Quick navigation table for domain-level browsing - Skill ID naming convention (Skill-{Domain}-{Number}) - Skill lifecycle states (Draft, Active, Deprecated) - Creation and deprecation process documentation Fixes #581 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits. |
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
PR Validation ReportCaution ❌ Status: FAIL Description Validation
QA Validation
|
Pass: Memory HealthMemory Health Report[PASS] 47/47 memories healthy
Summary: 47 healthy, 0 stale, 0 exempt, 0 errors Health Check Details
|
✅ Pass: Memory ValidationNo memories with citations found. 📊 Validation Details
|
README Troubleshooting section uses <code> inside <summary> tags, which is standard HTML for details/summary disclosure widgets. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 4❌ Failed checks (4 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
.markdownlint-cli2.yaml (1)
48-53:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 MinorAdd a business‑reason comment for the MD033 change.
Rule modifications must include inline rationale. Adding
codeto allowed elements is a rule change but has no specific reason documented.Proposed fix
MD033: allowed_elements: - br + # Allow inline code inside <summary> blocks in README troubleshooting - code - kbdAs per coding guidelines, "Never disable or modify linting rules without documenting the rationale with inline comments explaining the business reason."
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.markdownlint-cli2.yaml around lines 48 - 53, You added `code` to MD033's allowed_elements without documenting the business rationale; update the `.markdownlint-cli2.yaml` MD033 section to include an inline comment explaining why `code` is permitted (e.g., required for rendering inline code snippets from user-generated docs or API responses) so reviewers can see the explicit business reason for modifying the rule; reference the MD033 rule and the allowed_elements list in your comment to make the intent clear.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Outside diff comments:
In @.markdownlint-cli2.yaml:
- Around line 48-53: You added `code` to MD033's allowed_elements without
documenting the business rationale; update the `.markdownlint-cli2.yaml` MD033
section to include an inline comment explaining why `code` is permitted (e.g.,
required for rendering inline code snippets from user-generated docs or API
responses) so reviewers can see the explicit business reason for modifying the
rule; reference the MD033 rule and the allowed_elements list in your comment to
make the intent clear.
Summary
Skill-{Domain}-{Number}Changes
.serena/memories/skills-index.mdwith:Test Plan
Fixes #581
Generated with Claude Code