Docs: Remove invalid imageFormat from HTML-in-canvas twoslash example#7021
Merged
JonnyBurger merged 1 commit intomainfrom Apr 8, 2026
Merged
Docs: Remove invalid imageFormat from HTML-in-canvas twoslash example#7021JonnyBurger merged 1 commit intomainfrom
JonnyBurger merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Made-with: Cursor
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed — no issues found.
Big Pickle (free) ｜ 𝕏
docs: Remove invalid imageFormat from HTML-in-canvas twoslash example
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
The HTML-in-canvas doc example passed
imageFormat: 'png'torenderStillOnWeb(), but that option is not part of the API (still encoding usesstill.blob({ format: 'png' })instead). TypeScript reported TS2353 in the twoslash snippet andbuild-docsfailed.Change
Remove the invalid property from the twoslash sample so the docs typecheck passes.