-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
[BUG] useForm Hook Allows external enabled to override Internal ID Check, Causing API calls with undefined ID #6867 #7031
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] useForm Hook Allows external enabled to override Internal ID Check, Causing API calls with undefined ID #6867 #7031
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 1ae1e9b The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
✅ Deploy Preview for refine-doc-live-previews ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
Hi team 👋, |
…hub.com/DipakHalkude/refine into test/useform-queryoptions-enabled-tests Because I have not added the refinedev/core. So now I added that.
|
Hi team 👋, |
|
Now I deleted other 2 changeset and keep one which is for useForm tests. All changes are done: tests for useForm queryOptions.enabled behavior are added, branch is updated with main, and the changeset is properly added as a patch. Only one changeset is now present. The PR is ready for review — please let me know if any improvements are needed. Thank you! 🚀 |
|
Hi @BatuhanW 👋, I’ve opened this PR following the guidelines you shared. Could you please take a look and let me know your feedback? Thanks! 🙏 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If there are no changes in package dependencies, then there should be no changes in pnpm-lock.yaml.
pnpm i should solve this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok. Wait I am on it :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alicanerdurmaz Done, Please have a look :)
|
@alicanerdurmaz check now I guess the query you said is resolved now :) |
DipakHalkude
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Restored @refinedev/rest in examples/data-provider-strapi-v4 and examples/refine-hr-ce
Ran pnpm i (allowed lockfile update) and committed normalized pnpm-lock.yaml
PR branch updated; ready for re-review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alicanerdurmaz Done, Please have a look :)
|
Hey @DipakHalkude, thanks for improving Refine 🚀. We will merge this PR today. |
|
@alicanerdurmaz Thank you so much for reviewing and merging my PR! 🙏 I really appreciate your guidance and support throughout the process. Excited to continue contributing! 🚀 |
|
FYI @alicanerdurmaz this appears to have been a bot, see this and other repos attempted contributions happened to: vercel/turborepo#10796 |
|
Hi @spiceywasabi, just to clarify, that contribution was made by me personally and not a bot. I wanted to make sure there’s no confusion regarding my merged PRs. Thanks! |
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
Bugs / Features
What is the current behavior?
What is the new behavior?
fixes (issue)
Notes for reviewers