Support custom Flyway credentials/URL#29756
Conversation
|
Thanks for your pull request! The title of your pull request does not follow our editorial rules. Could you have a look?
|
|
The problem with closing PRs for the same issue is that you miss important comments. I think this is what we're looking for: #29628 (comment) Also with the snippet provided there, we no longer need the |
1f31923 to
3efba61
Compare
gsmet
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a note that I want to have a look at this before we merge.
3efba61 to
f369b72
Compare
e7a7b1a to
fa33f15
Compare
1fc620b to
78ae70d
Compare
853a2e2 to
65720ea
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
6be8c24 to
815c1a7
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
@gsmet kind reminder to have a look when possible ;) |
gsmet
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I spotted a few minor issues, I will fix them.
- Introduces `quarkus.flyway.username`, `quarkus.flyway.password` and `quarkus.flyway.jdbc-url` config options Co-Authored-By: George Gastaldi <gegastaldi@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
815c1a7 to
e7d1d24
Compare
gsmet
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I applied a few minor changes. Things should be good to go now. Thanks!
|
✔️ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully. It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary. |
|
@chrisruffalo I marked it to be backported to 2.16.2.Final. 2.15 is not possible (because it depends on #30455) UPDATE: Oh, it seems that 2.16.2.Final is out, I'll leave the backport decision to @gsmet |
|
@gastaldi 2.16 or would be amazing, 2.17 would be good as well. I'm not sure our timelines align with 3.0. |
|
There are no plans for a 2.7, the next release is 3.0. We're working hard on it |
|
@gastaldi that makes sense, thanks. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.