Conversation
|
Tests currently fail since the new code raises an error if the MD5 of the archive does not match. Shall I remove the download flag in the tests and simply parse the archives at first? Lines 111 to 116 in ed5b2dc |
fmassa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR!
I have a comment, I think it will make usability better. Let me know what you think
|
@pmeier thanks for the PR! Can you rebase your changes on top of master, I've fixed CI for most of them. |
61d7e23 to
2548910
Compare
|
LGTM, but test failures seem to be related? |
* remove force flag for parse_*_archive functions * cleanup
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1457 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 64.46% 64.34% -0.12%
==========================================
Files 83 83
Lines 6421 6454 +33
Branches 982 992 +10
==========================================
+ Hits 4139 4153 +14
- Misses 1992 2006 +14
- Partials 290 295 +5
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
I downloaded imagenet myself and used
|
addresses #1453
I introduced the function
parse_train_archiveandparse_val_archiveand changedparse_devkitto take in anstrpointing to an archive. Users that downloaded the dataset externally can use them to prepare the folders.