Skip to content

[benchmark] Skip pytorch_CycleGAN_and_pix2pix from inductor benchmarks#175299

Merged
atalman merged 1 commit intorelease/2.11from
cherry-pick-175066-by-pytorch_bot_bot_
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

[benchmark] Skip pytorch_CycleGAN_and_pix2pix from inductor benchmarks#175299
atalman merged 1 commit intorelease/2.11from
cherry-pick-175066-by-pytorch_bot_bot_

Conversation

@pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Summary

Skip the pytorch_CycleGAN_and_pix2pix benchmark model from the inductor benchmark suite.

This legacy 2017 model has been failing with eager_fail_to_run on 100%
of commits since mid-2025, providing zero CI signal while consuming
~5.3M GPU-seconds/week across 7+ benchmark jobs on CUDA, CPU, and ROCm.

Estimated savings: ~310 GPU-hours/week (~1,240 GPU-hours/month)

Skip it in torchbench.yaml and remove its entries from all 31 expected
accuracy CSV files. Also remove it from the higher_fp16 tolerance list.

See P2188981399 for the full CI workflow analysis.

Test Plan

  • CI should pass with CycleGAN skipped (it was already failing 100% of the time)
  • No other benchmark models affected

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @kadeng @chauhang @amjames @Lucaskabela @jataylo

#175066)

## Summary

Skip the `pytorch_CycleGAN_and_pix2pix` benchmark model from the inductor benchmark suite.

This legacy 2017 model has been failing with `eager_fail_to_run` on 100%
of commits since mid-2025, providing zero CI signal while consuming
~5.3M GPU-seconds/week across 7+ benchmark jobs on CUDA, CPU, and ROCm.

**Estimated savings: ~310 GPU-hours/week (~1,240 GPU-hours/month)**

Skip it in `torchbench.yaml` and remove its entries from all 31 expected
accuracy CSV files. Also remove it from the `higher_fp16` tolerance list.

See P2188981399 for the full CI workflow analysis.

## Test Plan

- CI should pass with CycleGAN skipped (it was already failing 100% of the time)
- No other benchmark models affected

Pull Request resolved: #175066
Approved by: https://github.com/huydhn, https://github.com/malfet

(cherry picked from commit 688c943)
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Feb 19, 2026

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/175299

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (2 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit db8085d with merge base 0fd766e (image):

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but was present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@atalman atalman merged commit 2ceed74 into release/2.11 Feb 19, 2026
162 of 164 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants