Skip to content

[caffe2] Support grouped filter in conv#12970

Closed
gujinghui wants to merge 1 commit intopytorch:masterfrom
gujinghui:group_in_conv
Closed

[caffe2] Support grouped filter in conv#12970
gujinghui wants to merge 1 commit intopytorch:masterfrom
gujinghui:group_in_conv

Conversation

@gujinghui
Copy link
Collaborator

@gujinghui gujinghui commented Oct 23, 2018

Support grouped filters which already pre-converted in optimize_ideep.

Signed-off-by: Gu, Jinghui <jinghui.gu@intel.com>
@gujinghui
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot retest this please

Copy link
Contributor

@yinghai yinghai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have test cases for grouped filter conv?

@gujinghui
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@yinghai
Yes, we have.
This PR is for the grouped filters which has been pre-converted in optimize_ideep.
And the test cases for such scenaro will be introduced in #9767 .

Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yinghai has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@yinghai
Copy link
Contributor

yinghai commented Oct 29, 2018

TBH, I'm not very fond of the the idea about the need of preprocessing of workspace. If anything, we should always have the cached processed tensor inside the operator just in case people run the net without preprocessing it.

Copy link
Contributor

@yinghai yinghai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please conform your clang-format to pytorch style.

@fmassa fmassa changed the title Support grouped filter in conv [caffe2] Support grouped filter in conv Jan 29, 2019
@gujinghui gujinghui closed this Mar 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants