Skip to content

Refactor s8s4_linear_cutlass()#1545

Merged
alexsamardzic merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
alexsamardzic:refactor-s8s4-linear-cutlass
Jan 21, 2025
Merged

Refactor s8s4_linear_cutlass()#1545
alexsamardzic merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
alexsamardzic:refactor-s8s4-linear-cutlass

Conversation

@alexsamardzic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-bot Bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/ao/1545

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ No Failures, 3 Pending

As of commit 99b75da with merge base 32d9b0b (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jan 10, 2025
@alexsamardzic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Refactored the code so that it is easier to extend it with combinations of quantized operands data types other than W4A8, like one proposed in #1515. Disadvantage: compilation time increased.

@alexsamardzic alexsamardzic mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2025
3 tasks
@jerryzh168 jerryzh168 added the module: not user facing Use this tag if you don't want this PR to show up in release notes label Jan 10, 2025
@alexsamardzic alexsamardzic merged commit ea7910e into pytorch:main Jan 21, 2025
@alexsamardzic alexsamardzic deleted the refactor-s8s4-linear-cutlass branch January 21, 2025 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. module: not user facing Use this tag if you don't want this PR to show up in release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants