Remove special handling due to IPython lacking support for exception groups#2702
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2702 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.94% 98.94% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 113 113
Lines 16919 16883 -36
Branches 3050 3036 -14
==========================================
- Hits 16741 16705 -36
Misses 123 123
Partials 55 55
|
|
I retargeted this PR to the PR that bumps dependencies and went ahead and marked this as reviewable: I think you will need to remove a test (or at least update it) but I believe this fixes the CI for that other PR. |
|
Sorry, I just realize I was mistaken. Your fix hasn't gone out, I just jumped the gun when I saw multierrors were formatting differently! Additionally, it seems I can't force-push my merge above out: :( |
Ah sorry, maybe could've been a bit clearer in my edit :)
Added you as a collaborator to the fork, think that might help? I could maybe start pushing branches to the |
|
Yeah I don't think that'll happen again: I'll try not to jump to conclusions next time! EDIT: I don't need to join your repo FWIW, you can force push yourself xd (since you're here, I just wanted to decrease the work I caused!) |
Ah, you can just push reversion commit[s] then. |
|
IPython 8.15 has been released with native |
00ba87b to
761ec2a
Compare
|
Looks like we just need to delete (and maybe also enable skip-covered in |
|
@TeamSpen210 mind adding a changelog entry as well? |
Quick draft request I'll look over later in case it needs further fixes, but IPython now has a workaround for displaying exceptiongroups, and the comment said this section could be removed in that case. ipython/ipython#13753
EDIT: I guess it needs a release too, and we'd need to bump the IPython requirement to that as well - so this will have to languish for quite a while.