Ci/apply concurrency to workflow#1200
Merged
codejedi365 merged 5 commits intopython-semantic-release:masterfrom Feb 23, 2025
Merged
Ci/apply concurrency to workflow#1200codejedi365 merged 5 commits intopython-semantic-release:masterfrom
codejedi365 merged 5 commits intopython-semantic-release:masterfrom
Conversation
3a37521 to
e9c3a2b
Compare
e9c3a2b to
b52bf77
Compare
b52bf77 to
28931d7
Compare
Contributor
Author
🎉 This PR has been published as part of Version 9.21.0 🎉You can find more information about this release on the GitHub Releases page. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
Rationale
See comment in issue #1201. Adds the documentation update to inform users on how to avoid concurrency issues while using the
--commitmechanism (generally required for an updating changelog).How did you test?
I ran through a series of live tests on my fork's GitHub actions workflow on the default branch. First was an push to master during the testing phase prior to release. Second test was the new push had a sleep build into it to make the release job extra long to where I could guarantee a push during the release job (and it not cancel due to concurrency but detect that upstream had moved and self-abort). The third push removed the arbitrary
sleepand successfully released since there was no change in the upstream branch. The third push pipeline also waited its turn for the job concurrency to allow it to start in the odd case that it was faster to get through testing than the other previously started pipeline. Not really applicable to PSR but was important to evaluate thatcancel-in-progress: falseactually had the other pipeline wait its turn.How to Verify
You should prep the commits for the following before walking master up the chain of commits pushing as you go because timing is critical for this evaluation.
PR Completion Checklist
Reviewed & followed the Contributor Guidelines
Changes Implemented & Validation pipeline succeeds
Commits follow the Conventional Commits standard
and are separated into the proper commit type and scope (recommended order: test, build, feat/fix, docs)
N/A
Appropriate Unit tests added/updatedN/A
Appropriate End-to-End tests added/updatedAppropriate Documentation added/updated and syntax validated for sphinx build (see Contributor Guidelines)