Simplify stub for datetime.datetime
#6320
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
srittau
approved these changes
Nov 16, 2021
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
1 similar comment
Contributor
|
According to mypy_primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉 |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The stub for
datetime.datetimeunnecessarily includes many methods that have identical signatures to the methods in its parent class,datetime.date. This is unnecessary.(All of my proposed deletions are methods that are directly inherited from
datetime.date, except for__hash__andtimetuple. These two are redefined indatetime.date, but maintain the same signature in the subclass that they have in the superclass.)