Skip to content

bpo-40499: Mention that asyncio.wait() needs a non-empty aws set #19900

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
gvanrossum merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2020
Merged

bpo-40499: Mention that asyncio.wait() needs a non-empty aws set #19900

gvanrossum merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2020

Conversation

@jrosdahl
Copy link
Contributor

@jrosdahl jrosdahl commented May 4, 2020 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

A similar formulation was added in bpo-21596
(db74d98) but was lost in bpo-33649
(3faaa88).

https://bugs.python.org/issue40499

@jrosdahl
bpo-40499: Mention that asyncio.wait() needs a non-empty aws set
3424325 
A similar formulation was added in bpo-21596
(db74d98) but was lost in bpo-33649
(3faaa88).
@jrosdahl jrosdahl requested review from 1st1 and asvetlov as code owners May 4, 2020 12:24
gvanrossum
gvanrossum approved these changes May 4, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@gvanrossum gvanrossum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your keen eye!

@gvanrossum gvanrossum merged commit 9d74658 into python:master May 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@gvanrossum gvanrossum gvanrossum approved these changes

@1st1 1st1 Awaiting requested review from 1st1

@asvetlov asvetlov Awaiting requested review from asvetlov

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@jrosdahl @gvanrossum @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot