Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Feb 6, 2020

Some numerator types used (specifically NumPy) decides to not
return a Python boolean for the "a != b" operation. Using the equivalent
call to bool() guarantees a bool return also for such types.
(cherry picked from commit 427c84f)

Co-authored-by: Sebastian Berg sebastian@sipsolutions.net

https://bugs.python.org/issue39274

Some numerator types used (specifically NumPy) decides to not
return a Python boolean for the "a != b" operation. Using the equivalent
call to bool() guarantees a bool return also for such types.
(cherry picked from commit 427c84f)

Co-authored-by: Sebastian Berg <sebastian@sipsolutions.net>
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, good bot.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@seberg and @vstinner: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 705d271 into python:3.7 Feb 6, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-427c84f-3.7 branch February 6, 2020 15:14
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@seberg and @vstinner: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants