Skip to content

Conversation

@ZeroIntensity
Copy link
Member

@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity commented Dec 16, 2025

See the DPO thread. As a result of my grumpiness (sorry!), the consensus seems to be that it's fine to keep this in the public API, primarily to save typing time when debugging.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--142848.org.readthedocs.build/

@ZeroIntensity
Copy link
Member Author

Victor and Petr: It wasn't clear to me whether this needed a new C API WG issue -- if you'd like another vote, please let me know.

@encukou
Copy link
Member

encukou commented Dec 17, 2025

I reopened capi-workgroup/decisions#87 (comment).

Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

The C API Working Group approved renaming the function to PyObject_Dump(): capi-workgroup/decisions#87 (comment)

@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity merged commit 19e64af into python:main Jan 16, 2026
50 checks passed
@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity deleted the rename-pyobject-dump branch January 16, 2026 14:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants