[3.6] bpo-35021: Fix assertion failures in _datetimemodule.c. (GH-10039)#10615
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Fixes assertion failures in _datetimemodule.c introduced in the previous fix (see bpo-31752). Rather of trying to handle an int subclass as exact int, let it to use overridden special methods, but check the result of divmod(). (cherry picked from commit 3ec0f49) Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
serhiy-storchaka
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2018
Contributor
Author
|
@serhiy-storchaka: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
Contributor
Author
|
@serhiy-storchaka: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes assertion failures in _datetimemodule.c
introduced in the previous fix (see bpo-31752).
Rather of trying to handle an int subclass as exact int,
let it to use overridden special methods, but check the
result of divmod().
(cherry picked from commit 3ec0f49)
Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka storchaka@gmail.com
https://bugs.python.org/issue35021