Add missing entries for un-vendored support#4661
Conversation
|
I've no idea why the un-vendored py36 job is failing, since there should be no difference with the py36 job... I've put the usual stuck pypy job out of its misery. |
|
So, IIRC, pip doesn't support running unvendored. It's just that it's a use case that we try to not break unintentionally. The news fragment would need to change and be a little clear about that. :) |
|
OK, I was not sure if a NEWS entry is even needed, as I think it's just un-breaking unreleased code, and NEWS only list changes between 2 official releases, no? |
|
Yeah, it should probably be ditched.
…On Wed, Aug 9, 2017, 21:57 Benoit Pierre ***@***.***> wrote:
OK, I was not sure if a NEWS entry is even needed, as I think it's just
un-breaking unreleased code, and the NEWS only list changes between 2
official releases, no?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4661 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADH7SSRdI1-VatPq-DoHWDqmvzXJB-kcks5sWd3agaJpZM4OyP87>
.
|
c5eeb37 to
04a5119
Compare
|
Rebased on master and removed the NEWS entry. |
|
Hello! I am an automated bot and I have noticed that this pull request is not currently able to be merged. If you are able to either merge the |
04a5119 to
d1e1c05
Compare
|
Rebased. |
|
Merging because the cost of getting it wrong is not too high. :) |
|
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Fix #4660.