Skip to content

Remove pycryptodomex from the package list#3261

Merged
hoodmane merged 1 commit intopyodide:mainfrom
ryanking13:remove/pycryptodomex
Nov 16, 2022
Merged

Remove pycryptodomex from the package list#3261
hoodmane merged 1 commit intopyodide:mainfrom
ryanking13:remove/pycryptodomex

Conversation

@ryanking13
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

pycryptodomex was added in #2966, but it had an invalid recipe name meta.yml (not meta.yaml) so our build system didn't build that package.

I found that in #3006, and I also found that it is not building well, so I disabled it then. So, in other words, pycryptodomex never worked in Pyodide.

I would like to remove it from the changelog and the repository for now, so that we don't add it to our next stable release accidentally. Perhaps someone interested can re-add this package.

cc: @Starz0r

Checklists

@ryanking13 ryanking13 mentioned this pull request Nov 16, 2022
15 tasks
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@hoodmane hoodmane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ryanking13 this has confused me several times.

@hoodmane hoodmane merged commit 54b469b into pyodide:main Nov 16, 2022
@hoodmane hoodmane deleted the remove/pycryptodomex branch November 16, 2022 02:26
@rth
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

rth commented Nov 16, 2022

so our build system didn't build that package.

Why did we have the output wheel in the dist folder then in the commit before this one (cf build-packages CI),

1.1M	dist/pycryptodome-3.15.0-cp35-abi3-emscripten_3_1_25_wasm32.whl
1.3M	dist/pycryptodome-tests.tar

(I also had trouble with it because it's an abi3 wheel, and assumed that cp35 was OK in this case, but maybe I'm wrong).

@rth
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

rth commented Nov 16, 2022

OK, different name, makes sense )

@hoodmane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yeah the fact that it's one letter different really confused me more than once too. This is kind of funny.

The abi3 rule is the cp35 has to be <= current interpreter (idea being that things are added to stable ABI but not removed or changed).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants