Ruff depth limit#391
Conversation
Merging this PR will improve performance by 18.61%
|
| Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | parse_1k_assigns__monty |
3.1 ms | 2.6 ms | +18.61% |
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ruff-depth-limit (01174ad) with main (fdced21)
Footnotes
-
15 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
Codecov Results 📊❌ Patch coverage is 67.27%. Project has 24878 uncovered lines. Files with missing lines (4)
Coverage diff@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #PR +/-##
==========================================
- Coverage 64.99% 64.98% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 269 269 —
Lines 70988 71041 +53
Branches 152951 153050 +99
==========================================
+ Hits 46138 46163 +25
- Misses 24850 24878 +28
- Partials 3958 3989 +31Generated by Codecov Action |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
30be6aa to
4090557
Compare
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Use ruff parsing depth limits as per astral-sh/ruff#24810