Merge with micropython upstream #1
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
May 26, 2025 16:03
Signed-off-by: Stephane Smith (stephanelsmith) <stephanelsmith@ymail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephane Smith (stephanelsmith) <stephanelsmith@ymail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
I merged in the upstream to bring the fork inline with micropython master. That's the first commit. The second commit, I found that I was having an error in a build path, possibly something changed in one of the 500 commits since the original fork?
Testing
I'm able to build on ESP32S3 using esp idf v5.4. I don't have a scope on me (on vacation), but am able to get the counter example working on a UM TINY S3.
This ULP branch is so awesome, would love to see this get merged into mainline! Hope this helps.