Skip to content

Could have other/original licence #20

@PallHaraldsson

Description

@PallHaraldsson

It's now under GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE.

There're some reasons for why I have to choose this

This is the license of the compiler itself, and I just note you can choose any license for it, even if you would link statically to LGPL (but not for GPL, that's the point of the lesser/library GPL).

For the code you emit, there's the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL_linking_exception for linking to GPL (but not needed for LGPL).

So if you really didn't want this license (I'm not saying it's bad), then you may have limited time to go back. I only noticed two commits since from others, and one was trivial, so I think can be ignored, and the other maybe, and even if it isn't it's only for tests and they could keep LGPL (or you could ask that person).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions