Skip to content

HTTP 2.0 #454

@westonplatter

Description

@westonplatter

I hope I'm not jumping the gun.

I started to use Puma 2 weeks ago in production and love it.

And so I wondered if HTTP 2.0 for Puma was on the feature list or maybe already in the works. After scanning the Github issues, I didn't find mention of HTTP 2.0. Therefore, I'm opening this issue to stir conversation regarding HTTP 2.0 features realizing they are far off, but still tantilizingly important.

Possibly important questions:

  • when should (if at all) puma make the advancement to HTTP 2.0?
  • what features are easy to get working?
  • what featurs are the most painful?
  • are there outstanding Puma issues to solve first?
  • are there other HTTP 2.0 implementations to copy from?

Happy to move the conversation else where if another communication channel is more appropriate. :)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions