-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
HTTP 2.0 #454
Copy link
Copy link
Closed as not planned
Description
I hope I'm not jumping the gun.
I started to use Puma 2 weeks ago in production and love it.
And so I wondered if HTTP 2.0 for Puma was on the feature list or maybe already in the works. After scanning the Github issues, I didn't find mention of HTTP 2.0. Therefore, I'm opening this issue to stir conversation regarding HTTP 2.0 features realizing they are far off, but still tantilizingly important.
Possibly important questions:
- when should (if at all) puma make the advancement to HTTP 2.0?
- what features are easy to get working?
- what featurs are the most painful?
- are there outstanding Puma issues to solve first?
- are there other HTTP 2.0 implementations to copy from?
Happy to move the conversation else where if another communication channel is more appropriate. :)
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels