[fuzz result]: footnote definitions are allowed to contain line breaks #760
Description
[^foo\ \ ]: this should not be a footnote, but pulldown-cmark thinks it is
GitHub doesn't allow that, and neither does markdown-it. It's allowed for link definitions, but since the new-style footnotes are supposed to act like GitHub, we should follow it.
Details
This sample doesn't really say much about the bug above, but testing it and a few variants vs GitHub happened after finding a discrepancy with Pandoc.
"[^^\n\n]:\n" -> [
Start(Paragraph)
Text(Boxed("[^^"))
End(Paragraph)
Start(Paragraph)
Text(Boxed("]:"))
End(Paragraph)
]Events from pandoc:
"[^^\n\n]:\n" -> [
]