refactor: clean up various refactorings#6165
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Oops, accidentally applied a named expression. I'll fix that |
Contributor
|
Thanks for the effort but we do not accept arbitrary refactorings of numerous disparate places in the code that aren't related. This tends to invite floods if other questionable large scale refactorings. The refactoring is usually largely subjective and unsolicited. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
contextlib.suppressrather than emptyexcept.formatand+-based concatenation for improved performance.elifvia refactoring.yield frominstead ofyieldfor 15–20% performance gain (on average)list()rather than iteration