Skip to content

naming: Update metric and label name restrictions and recommendations with the latest context#2626

Merged
bwplotka merged 3 commits intomainfrom
naming
Apr 24, 2025
Merged

naming: Update metric and label name restrictions and recommendations with the latest context#2626
bwplotka merged 3 commits intomainfrom
naming

Conversation

@bwplotka
Copy link
Member

Notable changes

  • Cleaned up should/must/may to upper case for clarity (as per RFC style we do in specs).
  • Mentioned UTF-8 support.
  • Lifted limited character set from MUST to SHOULD with a clear about consequences and downsides.
  • Mentioned alternative notations.
  • Removed experimental mentions about native histograms, made it part of the main sample definition.
  • Added section on WHY Prometheus metric SHOULD contain type and unit suffix, even with our type and unit labels one day.

Motivation

…context.

### Notable changes

* Cleaned up should/must/may to upper case for clarity (as per RFC style we do in specs).
* Mentioned UTF-8 support.
* Lifted limited character set from MUST to SHOULD with a clear about consequences and downsides.
* Mentioned alternative notations.
* Removed experimental mentions about native histograms, made it part of the main sample definition.
* Added section on WHY Prometheus metric SHOULD contain type and unit suffix, even with our type and unit labels one day.

### Motivation

* [OpenMetrics WG 2.0 Action item](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FCD-38Xz1-9b3ExgHOeDTQUKUatzgj5KbCND9t-abZY/edit?tab=t.lvx6fags1fga#heading=h.3xjg8jcpctk4
) and blocker to relax MUST to SHOULD type and unit suffix in OpenMetrics 2.0.
* Similarly, to have something clear to reference to highlight huge downsides of skipping suffixes for OTLP (prometheus/prometheus#16441)
* To help with explaining this problem to Prometheus users in general (on recent KubeCons we had to explain this hundrends of times).


Signed-off-by: bwplotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@bboreham bboreham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally fine. Some thoughts below.

Copy link
Member

@beorn7 beorn7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing this.

Copy link
Member

@ArthurSens ArthurSens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

besides all that has already been said, found one other thing

bwplotka and others added 2 commits April 23, 2025 09:25
Co-authored-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Björn Rabenstein <beorn@grafana.com>
Co-authored-by: George Krajcsovits <krajorama@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: bwplotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
@bwplotka
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you so much for all the great feedback @bboreham @beorn7 @ArthurSens @krajorama

Should be good for "final" look! 💪🏽

Copy link
Member

@ArthurSens ArthurSens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you!

@bwplotka bwplotka merged commit 9b0d0c5 into main Apr 24, 2025
5 checks passed
@bwplotka bwplotka deleted the naming branch April 24, 2025 11:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants