Skip to content

Conversation

@wmcram
Copy link
Contributor

@wmcram wmcram commented Aug 13, 2025

The Negotiate function in the expfmt package was referencing a function NegotiateOpenMetrics which probably should be NegotiateIncludingOpenMetrics. I also noticed that the test referencing this function had the same issue; this commit makes the naming consistent everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Wil Cram wcram@wisc.edu

Signed-off-by: Wil Cram <wcram@wisc.edu>
Copy link
Member

@ywwg ywwg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

noop lgtm. I don't know if we have a CLA that needs to be signed?

@wmcram
Copy link
Contributor Author

wmcram commented Aug 13, 2025

Since the project is Apache licensed and this pr adds no new functionality, it looks like we should be fine.

@ArthurSens
Copy link
Member

noop lgtm. I don't know if we have a CLA that needs to be signed?

We have DCO checks, that should be enough :)

@ArthurSens ArthurSens merged commit 01383ba into prometheus:main Aug 13, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants