Skip to content

Remove references to iptables#477

Merged
mtrmac merged 1 commit into
podman-container-tools:mainfrom
l0rd:iptables-rm
Nov 22, 2025
Merged

Remove references to iptables#477
mtrmac merged 1 commit into
podman-container-tools:mainfrom
l0rd:iptables-rm

Conversation

@l0rd

@l0rd l0rd commented Nov 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a follow-up of

containers/netavark#1353
podman-container-tools/podman#27555

And related to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RUN-3723

Signed-off-by: Mario Loriedo <mario.loriedo@gmail.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the common Related to "common" package label Nov 19, 2025

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mtrmac mtrmac left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

This LGTM, and merging as is, because this is clearly necessary to follow the removal from Netavark.

… but there are other references to iptables in the repo (PATH updates, SELinux labeling, and more). Do those need to be updated as well?

@mtrmac mtrmac merged commit ec0b4f9 into podman-container-tools:main Nov 22, 2025
17 checks passed
@Luap99

Luap99 commented Nov 22, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

… but there are other references to iptables in the repo (PATH updates, SELinux labeling, and more). Do those need to be updated as well?

PATH likely has to stay as we still execute nftables, selinux and the likely needs to be checked. There is a bunch of extra logic for the rootless netns because iptables had to write to /run/xtables.lock IIRC so there is room to futher simplify

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

common Related to "common" package

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants