[doc] Mention test-pmd-tool as alternative for testing#6396
[doc] Mention test-pmd-tool as alternative for testing#6396
Conversation
|
No regression tested rules have been changed. (comment created at 2026-02-17 19:15:50+00:00 for f2286a8) |
|
If you’re happy with the code/direction I am open to donating the code to the PMD project. |
|
I am just a passerby so apologies if it's severe ignorance but the link does not work. Looking at the profile I think you meant https://github.com/starch-uk/test-pmd-tool ? |
Typo spotted by @goto-dev-null
Thank you @goto-dev-null |
adangel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR!
While your project is interesting, I don't think it fits into the page "3rd party rulesets", as it doesn't provide rules. It's an alternative way to https://docs.pmd-code.org/latest/pmd_userdocs_extending_testing.html . Maybe it's better to mention this on that page?
adangel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks. I've moved your tool to the other page, were we explain how to test rules.
|
So sorry, forgot to come back to this. Thank you. |
Describe the PR
Adds a new entry to the list of third-party PMD rulesets in the documentation. It introduces the
test-pmd-ruleproject, which provides unit test coverage for PMD XPath rules using its own examples.Documentation update:
test-pmd-ruleto the list of third-party PMD rulesets indocs/pages/pmd/userdocs/3rdpartyrulesets.md, including a link to its repository.Ready?
./mvnw clean verifypasses (checked automatically by github actions)