Skip to content

unite BSD-style license by automation #5850

@Pankraz76

Description

@Pankraz76

confusion licence header

having 2 variants for one and the same makes me wonder, which one is right? Actually no one seems to care, as expected, as its always some random impl. detail, no one considers, until broken. PMD deserves better.

Never the less SSOT/SPOT seem to finalize this discussion, closing the broken window effect.

spot is ready to take over the flaws missed by check:

/**
 * BSD-style license; for more info see http://pmd.sourceforge.net/license.html
 */
/*
 * BSD-style license; for more info see http://pmd.sourceforge.net/license.html
 */
image image

Related issues

  • Fix #

Ready?

  • Added unit tests for fixed bug/feature
  • Passing all unit tests
  • Complete build ./mvnw clean verify passes (checked automatically by github actions)
  • Added (in-code) documentation (if needed)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    a:bugPMD crashes or fails to analyse a file.

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions