Skip to content

Update tipb: add keep_order field in TableScan#5400

Merged
ti-chi-bot merged 3 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
JinheLin:update_tipb
Jul 19, 2022
Merged

Update tipb: add keep_order field in TableScan#5400
ti-chi-bot merged 3 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
JinheLin:update_tipb

Conversation

@JinheLin
Copy link
Contributor

@JinheLin JinheLin commented Jul 18, 2022

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #5376

Problem Summary: Add keep_order to indicate whether to keep order in BlockInputStream.

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jul 18, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • JaySon-Huang
  • windtalker

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 18, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@JaySon-Huang JaySon-Huang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jul 18, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@windtalker windtalker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Jul 18, 2022
@JinheLin
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@JinheLin: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

DetailsCommit hash: 5444458

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jul 19, 2022
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@JinheLin: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

Coverage for changed files

no c/c++ source change detected

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18594      9572             48.52%    211802  96366        54.50%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

Coverage for changed files

no c/c++ source change detected

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18617      9409             49.46%    212150  94987        55.23%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@JinheLin
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@JinheLin: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

Coverage for changed files

no c/c++ source change detected

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18617      9409             49.46%    212150  95028        55.21%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@JinheLin
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@JinheLin: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

Coverage for changed files

no c/c++ source change detected

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18617      9409             49.46%    212150  95007        55.22%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@JaySon-Huang
Copy link
Contributor

/run-all-tests

@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented Jul 19, 2022

Coverage for changed files

no c/c++ source change detected

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18617      9406             49.48%    212150  94961        55.24%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 21dea59 into pingcap:master Jul 19, 2022
@JinheLin JinheLin deleted the update_tipb branch August 4, 2022 07:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants