Skip to content

Add coprocessor support in TiFlash#161

Merged
zanmato1984 merged 105 commits intomasterfrom
cop
Oct 17, 2019
Merged

Add coprocessor support in TiFlash#161
zanmato1984 merged 105 commits intomasterfrom
cop

Conversation

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-integration-tests

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

  1. catch (...);
  2. align region status with tikv;
  3. consider using pipeline for encoding output stream;
  4. consider order by remove;

* 1. remove duplicate agg funcs, 2. for column ref expr, change column_id to column_index since the value stored in column ref expr is not column id

* bug fix
required_columns.push_back(pk_handle_col->get().name);
auto pair = storage->getColumns().getPhysical(pk_handle_col->get().name);
source_columns.push_back(pair);
is_ts_column.push_back(false);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If pk_handle_col->get().tp is TiDB::TypeTimestamp, this chould be true?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, timestamp col will never be pk handle col

Copy link
Contributor

@lidezhu lidezhu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@birdstorm birdstorm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-integration-tests

3 similar comments
@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-integration-tests

@zyguan
Copy link
Contributor

zyguan commented Oct 17, 2019

/run-integration-tests

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-integration-tests

@zanmato1984 zanmato1984 merged commit 5771f0c into master Oct 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants