Skip to content

planner: PhysicalPlan memory trace 7#38030

Merged
ti-chi-bot merged 12 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
fzzf678:physicalPlan_memTrace_7
Sep 23, 2022
Merged

planner: PhysicalPlan memory trace 7#38030
ti-chi-bot merged 12 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
fzzf678:physicalPlan_memTrace_7

Conversation

@fzzf678
Copy link
Contributor

@fzzf678 fzzf678 commented Sep 21, 2022

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #37632

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Implement MemoryUsage() for

  • mockDataPhysicalPlan
  • mockPhysicalIndexReader
  • mockPhysicalPlan4Test
  • mockPlan
  • PhysicalCTE
  • PhysicalCTETable
  • CTEDefinition
  • PhysicalTableSample
  • PhysicalUnionAll

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Sep 21, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • Reminiscent
  • qw4990

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 21, 2022
@fzzf678 fzzf678 marked this pull request as draft September 21, 2022 06:13
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 21, 2022
@fzzf678 fzzf678 marked this pull request as ready for review September 21, 2022 10:07
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 21, 2022
@qw4990 qw4990 added type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement. sig/planner SIG: Planner epic/plan-cache labels Sep 22, 2022
return
}

sum = emptyCTEClassSize + cc.seedPartPhysicalPlan.MemoryUsage() + cc.recursivePartPhysicalPlan.MemoryUsage()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is that safe to call MemoyUsage even if seedPartPhysicalPlan is nil?

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Sep 22, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Sep 23, 2022
@Reminiscent
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

DetailsCommit hash: 7826848

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Sep 23, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit c4f6de1 into pingcap:master Sep 23, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Sep 23, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

✅ Well Done! New fixed [2] after this pr merged.

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test ✅ all 6 tests passed 23 min Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test ✅ all 17 tests passed 15 min Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 37 tests passed 28 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 12 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 11 tests passed 10 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 5 min 4 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 4 min 33 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 25 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 2 min 27 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

epic/plan-cache release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/planner SIG: Planner size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants