Skip to content

planner: fix unstable test TestDAGPlanBuilderUnionScan#37895

Merged
ti-chi-bot merged 9 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
fzzf678:fix_TestDAGPlanBuilderUnionScan
Oct 18, 2022
Merged

planner: fix unstable test TestDAGPlanBuilderUnionScan#37895
ti-chi-bot merged 9 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
fzzf678:fix_TestDAGPlanBuilderUnionScan

Conversation

@fzzf678
Copy link
Contributor

@fzzf678 fzzf678 commented Sep 16, 2022 •
edited
Loading

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #37621

Problem Summary:
The ut logical is expired.

What is changed and how it works?

Supply test result and load data.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Sep 16, 2022 •
edited
Loading

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • hawkingrei
  • qw4990

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 16, 2022
@hawkingrei hawkingrei self-requested a review September 16, 2022 10:38
@fzzf678 fzzf678 marked this pull request as ready for review September 20, 2022 10:13
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 20, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 21, 2022
@fzzf678
Copy link
Contributor Author

fzzf678 commented Sep 27, 2022

/cc @qw4990

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot requested a review from qw4990 September 27, 2022 08:19
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Sep 27, 2022
@hawkingrei hawkingrei requested review from Yisaer and chrysan October 16, 2022 15:30
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Oct 18, 2022
@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

qw4990 commented Oct 18, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Oct 18, 2022

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

DetailsCommit hash: dcb68f7

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Oct 18, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 5cb35c6 into pingcap:master Oct 18, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot mentioned this pull request Oct 18, 2022
Closed
12 tasks
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Oct 18, 2022

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #38519.

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Oct 18, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! New failing [1] after this pr merged.
These new failed integration tests seem to be caused by the current PR, please try to fix these new failed integration tests, thanks!

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟥 failed 1, success 10, total 11 10 min New failing
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🔴 failed 3, success 14, total 17 17 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 24 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 37 tests passed 23 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 6 min 18 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 4 min 57 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 3 min 57 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 10 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 2 min 48 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

@fzzf678 fzzf678 added the type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug. label Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@hawkingrei hawkingrei hawkingrei approved these changes

@qw4990 qw4990 qw4990 approved these changes

@chrysan chrysan Awaiting requested review from chrysan

@Yisaer Yisaer Awaiting requested review from Yisaer

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TestDAGPlanBuilderUnionScan is a break test

5 participants

@fzzf678 @ti-chi-bot @qw4990 @sre-bot @hawkingrei