Skip to content

executor: ALTER TABLE COMPACT support partition#36173

Merged
ti-chi-bot merged 9 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
hehechen:compact_partition
Sep 28, 2022
Merged

executor: ALTER TABLE COMPACT support partition#36173
ti-chi-bot merged 9 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
hehechen:compact_partition

Conversation

@hehechen
Copy link
Contributor

@hehechen hehechen commented Jul 13, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Signed-off-by: hehechen awd123456sss@gmail.com

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #36175 ref pingcap/tiflash#5315

Problem Summary:
In #34741 and #36368, ALTER TABLE [name] COMPACT and ALTER TABLE [name] COMPACT TIFLASH REPLICA syntax has been added. Deal with partition tables, allowing more fine-grained control. The syntax can be extended as: ALTER TABLE [name] COMPACT PARTITION [PartitionNameList] and ALTER TABLE [name] COMPACT PARTITION [PartitionNameList] TIFLASH REPLICA

What is changed and how it works?

  • Parser:
    Add new syntaxes:
    ALTER TABLE [name] COMPACT PARTITION [PartitionNameList]
    ALTER TABLE [name] COMPACT PARTITION [PartitionNameList] TIFLASH REPLICA.

  • Executor:
    In compact_table executor, find the partition name in table info, and send compact request to TiFlash for these partitions.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • compact partition table, with valid and invalid partition name list.
    • Use PARTITION and no PARTITION to compact a table without partition respectively.
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jul 13, 2022 •
edited
Loading

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • breezewish
  • crazycs520

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 13, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jul 13, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Code Coverage Details: https://codecov.io/github/pingcap/tidb/commit/abbb12aa94ffe857441cba93b9f00c2aed94bf80

@hehechen hehechen force-pushed the compact_partition branch from f0189a5 to fa484b0 Compare July 13, 2022 06:40
@hehechen hehechen marked this pull request as draft July 13, 2022 06:58
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 13, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 22, 2022
@hehechen hehechen force-pushed the compact_partition branch 2 times, most recently from 09f4529 to 306ae38 Compare August 10, 2022 03:16
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 10, 2022
@hehechen
Copy link
Contributor Author

hehechen commented Aug 10, 2022

/rebuild

crazycs520
crazycs520 reviewed Aug 10, 2022
View reviewed changes
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 12, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 19, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 4, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 26, 2022
@hehechen hehechen force-pushed the compact_partition branch 2 times, most recently from d8ed129 to a6b7d21 Compare September 26, 2022 16:04
@hehechen
executor: ALTER TABLE COMPACT support partition
6042915 
Signed-off-by: hehechen <awd123456sss@gmail.com>
@hehechen hehechen marked this pull request as ready for review September 27, 2022 06:08
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 27, 2022
@hehechen
Copy link
Contributor Author

hehechen commented Sep 27, 2022

/cc @breezewish

crazycs520
crazycs520 reviewed Sep 27, 2022
View reviewed changes
@windtalker
Copy link
Contributor

windtalker commented Sep 27, 2022

I'm not sure if alter table t compact partition p1,p2,... tiflash replica is a good statement, my first thought was alter table t partition(p1,p2,...) compact tiflash replica, because MySQL has a similar statement that you can select data from some partitions.
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/partitioning-selection.html

windtalker
windtalker reviewed Sep 27, 2022
View reviewed changes
@hehechen
Copy link
Contributor Author

hehechen commented Sep 27, 2022 •
edited
Loading

I'm not sure if alter table t compact partition p1,p2,... tiflash replica is a good statement, my first thought was alter table t partition(p1,p2,...) compact tiflash replica, because MySQL has a similar statement that you can select data from some partitions. https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/partitioning-selection.html

https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/partitioning-maintenance.html
MySQL has similar statements ALTER TABLE t1 OPTIMIZE PARTITION p0, p1; and ALTER TABLE t1 ANALYZE PARTITION p3;.

@hehechen hehechen requested review from crazycs520 and windtalker and removed request for breezewish, crazycs520 and windtalker September 27, 2022 10:12
@hehechen
address comment
7e3c8fa 
Signed-off-by: hehechen <awd123456sss@gmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Sep 27, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Sep 27, 2022
windtalker
windtalker approved these changes Sep 27, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@windtalker windtalker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

breezewish
breezewish reviewed Sep 27, 2022
View reviewed changes
@hehechen
fix public
c06dec4 
Signed-off-by: hehechen <awd123456sss@gmail.com>
@hehechen hehechen requested a review from breezewish September 27, 2022 14:36
@breezewish
Copy link
Member

breezewish commented Sep 28, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Sep 28, 2022

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

DetailsCommit hash: c06dec4

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Sep 28, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 415d03f into pingcap:master Sep 28, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Sep 28, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! [1] CI still failing after this pr merged.
These failed integration tests don't seem to be introduced by the current PR.

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🔴 failed 1, success 10, total 11 8 min 34 sec Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 37 tests passed 26 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 24 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🟢 all 17 tests passed 11 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 6 min 21 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 5 min 50 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 5 min 39 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 1 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 2 min 49 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@windtalker windtalker windtalker approved these changes

@crazycs520 crazycs520 crazycs520 approved these changes

@breezewish breezewish Awaiting requested review from breezewish

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Per-Partition support for "alter table xxx compact tiflash replica"

6 participants

@hehechen @ti-chi-bot @sre-bot @windtalker @breezewish @crazycs520