Skip to content

expression: support builtin func password for GBK#29202

Merged
ti-chi-bot merged 6 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
Defined2014:password
Nov 5, 2021
Merged

expression: support builtin func password for GBK#29202
ti-chi-bot merged 6 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
Defined2014:password

Conversation

@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #29092

Problem Summary: support builtin func password for GBK

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Oct 28, 2021

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • wjhuang2016
  • xiongjiwei

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Oct 28, 2021
@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @zimulala @tangenta @wjhuang2016
PTAL

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add a new function here to reduce memcpy when []byte to string

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it the same as MySQL 5.7?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tried on http://sqlfiddle.com/ which is MySQL 5.6. The result is same.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tried on https://www.db-fiddle.com/ with MySQL 5.7. It also worked.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Oct 28, 2021
@Defined2014 Defined2014 force-pushed the password branch 2 times, most recently from 478615c to 683f6b8 Compare November 3, 2021 03:22
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 3, 2021
@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @AilinKid
PTAL

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot requested a review from AilinKid November 4, 2021 09:12
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Nov 5, 2021
@xiongjiwei
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

DetailsCommit hash: 92328fd

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 5, 2021
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@Defined2014: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-check_dev_2

2 similar comments
@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-check_dev_2

@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-check_dev_2

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 9409d54 into pingcap:master Nov 5, 2021
@Defined2014 Defined2014 deleted the password branch November 5, 2021 04:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support GBK for builtin function PasswordFunc

4 participants