Skip to content

expression: Support GBK for builtin function MD5#29165

Merged
ti-chi-bot merged 8 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
Defined2014:md5
Nov 3, 2021
Merged

expression: Support GBK for builtin function MD5#29165
ti-chi-bot merged 8 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
Defined2014:md5

Conversation

@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #29090

Problem Summary: Support GBK for builtin function MD5

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Oct 27, 2021

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • xiongjiwei
  • zimulala

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 27, 2021
@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @xiongjiwei @tangenta
PTAL

@xiongjiwei
Copy link
Contributor

/run-check_dev_2

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Oct 27, 2021
@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @zimulala
PTAL

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have a test for this logic?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, we will not go to this branch in TiDB normal use, because of #28778. If it's necessary, I will add it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And a question here, need I add a warning log when get invalid character here?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hawkingrei #29314 will handle this problem uniformly? Maybe we can return an error or a panic?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Defined2014 Defined2014 Nov 2, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zimulala Updated PTAL

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hawkingrei #29314 will handle this problem uniformly? Maybe we can return an error or a panic?

OK, I will.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 1, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 2, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@zimulala zimulala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Nov 3, 2021
@zimulala
Copy link
Contributor

zimulala commented Nov 3, 2021

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

DetailsCommit hash: 3c5c29f

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 3, 2021
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@Defined2014: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-check_dev_2

@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-build

@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-check_dev_2

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit ee2adfd into pingcap:master Nov 3, 2021
@Defined2014 Defined2014 deleted the md5 branch November 3, 2021 02:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support GBK for builtin function MD5

6 participants