types/data: the bit data type should be treat as uint64 (#11951)#12424
types/data: the bit data type should be treat as uint64 (#11951)#12424zz-jason merged 21 commits intopingcap:release-2.1from
Conversation
|
/run-all-tests |
|
/rebuild |
qw4990
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please help us resolve CI problems. @gaoxingliang
Hi @qw4990 I know how to fix this. but I don't know the process flow of how to operate. Do I need to create a new PR base on |
qw4990
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@gaoxingliang Sorry for my late reply.
You can fetch the branch release-2.1 to local and git cherry-pick your PR into your local release-2.1 and then create a new PR to merge your local release-2.1 to TiDB release-2.1.
|
I've resolved the conflict. |
|
/run-unit-test |
|
/run-unit-test |
1 similar comment
|
/run-unit-test |
|
I'm debugging this unit test failing, along with #13751 |
|
/run-unit-test |
|
/run-unit-test |
1 similar comment
|
/run-unit-test |
b774695 to
af96a3a
Compare
|
/run-all-tests |
|
/run-all-tests |
cherry-pick #11951 to release-2.1
What problem does this PR solve?
Fix #11895
the -1 can't be insert into a bit column.
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests