project-governance: Make voting more generic#2
Open
wking wants to merge 1 commit intophilips:release-approval-processfrom
Open
project-governance: Make voting more generic#2wking wants to merge 1 commit intophilips:release-approval-processfrom
wking wants to merge 1 commit intophilips:release-approval-processfrom
Conversation
This is useful for more than release approval. For example, it's useful for updating the project governance document itself [1]. I've also tried to address Jason's other points, except for defining a "breaking change" (since that is tied up in [2]). New wording about motions and whatnot is pulled from Roberts' [3], see proposing a motion (RRoO I.4, p33) and seconding a motion (RRoO I.5, p36). The subject templates I just made up on my own after thinking over the initial proposal emails (e.g. [4]). I also pulled in the one-sentence pattern [5] since I was touching so much. [1]: https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/d/msg/dev/ik3MIDWq4Us/Zx1JUStXBAAJ Subject: Re: Vote Required: OCI Image Spec Release Process Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:58:58 -0700 Message-ID: <CAFi6z1HAkKbnMoAXubyGusQJ_MromgpQ4qHCQ3R9_NwZNYBX5w@mail.gmail.com> [2]: opencontainers#16 [3]: http://archive.org/details/Robertsrulesofor00robe_201303 [4]: https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/forum/#!topic/dev/ik3MIDWq4Us Subject: Vote Required: OCI Image Spec Release Process Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:56:40 +0000 Message-ID: <CAD2oYtNnW+hP7Q3NPBdYHOKfigU0pvbgcphKPhRB=ZfQBwX8VA@mail.gmail.com> [5]: opencontainers#15 (comment) Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Author
|
When porting this to project-template or getting it adopted by a project, I'd suggest splitting the generic “project governance” rules into Once that's adopted (assuming it is), you can use it to propose the release rules as a separate motion. I'd store those in project-template under |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is useful for more than release approval. For example, it's useful for updating the project governance document itself.
I've also tried to address Jason's other points, except for defining a "breaking change" (since that is tied up in opencontainers#16).
New wording about motions and whatnot is pulled from Roberts', see proposing a motion (RRoO I.4, p33) and seconding a motion (RRoO I.5, p36).
The subject templates I just made up on my own after thinking over the initial proposal emails (e.g. this one). I also pulled in the one-sentence pattern since I was touching so much.
Feel free to pick and choose from this commit, since it isn't particularly atomic. You can also tell me which portions you like (or don't) and I'll work to isolate them in separate PRs.