Skip to content

Conversation

@metalmatze
Copy link
Member

To support adding rows with just addresses, we'd have had to copy a lot of code. This was the perfect opportunity to finally introduce a better abstract - the flamegraphBuilder.
There are some other pieces we may consider moving into this struct/builder in the future. I can also see having something like a flamegraphBuilder.NewRecord() to wrap some of the internals even more. Overall, these are minor improvements though.

The UI needed some small tweaks to properly support function names being null.

Copy link
Member

@brancz brancz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm but pleeeeeeease let's refactor those continue statements

@metalmatze
Copy link
Member Author

Yep, I'm sure they are going sooner than later too.

@metalmatze metalmatze merged commit 64df18e into main Jul 12, 2023
@metalmatze metalmatze deleted the flamegraph-arrow-unsymbolized branch July 12, 2023 14:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants