Skip to content

Conversation

@untitaker
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts commit 1577e13.

@untitaker untitaker self-assigned this Mar 30, 2015
@untitaker
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have no idea why this fails, I thought it'd be a fairly straightforward change. Anybody?

@untitaker untitaker mentioned this pull request Apr 1, 2015
@davidism
Copy link
Member

What's the history/status of this? Why did it need to be reverted? Did those other two referenced issues effect it?

@untitaker
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's a refactor that I thought was completely trivial, but for some reason it breaks CI, so I postponed it indefinetly.

On 31 October 2015 04:55:55 CET, David Lord notifications@github.com wrote:

What's the history/status of this? Why did it need to be reverted?
Did those other two referenced issues effect it?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#1407 (comment)

Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.

@untitaker
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't care about this anymore. IIRC either variant is fine, so who really cares?

@untitaker untitaker closed this Feb 17, 2016
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 14, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants