spec(ship-two-models): v2.91.0 — §46 v0.32.0 release-cut decision (HOLD on SHIP-007)#1449
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…cision After §45 landed the 5/5 DISCHARGE milestone for `apr-cpu-vs-gpu-output-parity-v1`, the natural follow-up question is whether the 238 commits accumulated since v0.31.2 (2026-04-19) warrant a `cargo publish` cut today. ## Verdict: HOLD The release-readiness audit found exactly one load-bearing blocker — SHIP-007 layer-0 attention divergence is empirically pinpointed (cos=0.99999995 attn_norm → 0.9966 attn_out per memory `2026-05-03 SHIP-007 finding`) but **not yet fixed**, so cutting v0.32.0 today would crates.io-ship a binary where `apr run` on a 7B GPU teacher still emits gibberish unless the user passes `--no-gpu`. The §41-§45 jidoka armor makes the failure visible + fail-closed (which is shippable behaviour), but a user-facing `## [0.32.0]` headline that reads "5/5 DISCHARGE on apr-cpu-vs-gpu-output-parity-v1" implies the GPU correctness hole is closed when in truth it is only contained. Per `feedback_fix_root_cause_never_route_around.md`: route-around-via-fallback is acceptable as a *temporary jidoka layer*, but it is muda to ship a release whose headline claims a fix that doesn't exist. ## What §46 records | Subsection | Content | |---|---| | 46.1 | What's accumulated since v0.31.2 (8-row headline table) | | 46.2 | Release-readiness gate audit (6-gate verdict table) | | 46.3 | Why SHIP-007 is the load-bearing blocker | | 46.4 | Pre-flight artifacts shipped alongside this decision (PR #1448) | | 46.5 | **Pre-conditions for the v0.32.0 cut** — 5 falsifiable gates | | 46.6 | Five Whys (why hold / why now / why §46 not extend §45) | | 46.7 | Net effects + ranked open follow-ups | | 46.8 | Spec amendment cadence preserved | ## Pre-conditions (§46.5) for the future v0.32.0 cut 1. SHIP-007 layer-0 attention divergence FIXED (cos ≥ 0.999 at every sub-stage) 2. PR #1448 merged (CHANGELOG `[Unreleased]` populated; README drift gate GREEN) 3. Workspace version bumped 0.31.2 → 0.32.0; `## [0.32.0] - <date>` heading 4. Post-publish QA: `cargo install aprender --force` + /dogfood GO verdict (per `feedback_post_publish_qa_required.md` — v0.31.1 was yanked for skipping) 5. Drift gates GREEN: `check_readme_claims.sh` + `pv validate` + `cargo deny` ## Net effects - Spec v2.90.0 → **v2.91.0** - MODEL-1 ship %: unchanged at 91% (this is metadata, not a falsifier flip) - MODEL-2 ship %: unchanged at 57% - Coverage tally: unchanged (no PARTIAL → DISCHARGED in this cycle) - Single highest-leverage next-session deliverable: SHIP-007 layer-0 attention bisection using `apr trace --save-tensor` + HF FP16 oracle from PR #1423 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Spec v2.90.0 → v2.91.0 records the v0.32.0 release-cut decision: HOLD, gated on SHIP-007 layer-0 attention bisection.
After §45 landed the 5/5 DISCHARGE milestone for `apr-cpu-vs-gpu-output-parity-v1`, the natural follow-up question was whether the 238 commits accumulated since v0.31.2 (2026-04-19) warrant a `cargo publish` cut today.
Verdict: HOLD
The release-readiness audit found exactly one load-bearing blocker — SHIP-007 layer-0 attention divergence is empirically pinpointed (cos=0.99999995 attn_norm → 0.9966 attn_out per memory `2026-05-03 SHIP-007 finding`) but not yet fixed, so cutting v0.32.0 today would crates.io-ship a binary where `apr run` on a 7B GPU teacher still emits gibberish unless the user passes `--no-gpu`.
Per `feedback_fix_root_cause_never_route_around.md`: route-around-via-fallback is acceptable as a temporary jidoka layer, but it is muda to ship a release whose headline ("5/5 DISCHARGE") implies a fix that doesn't exist.
What §46 records
Pre-conditions (§46.5) for the future v0.32.0 cut
Net effects
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code