Skip to content

feat(linter/jest): share common pattern expect functions#21376

Merged
camc314 merged 1 commit intooxc-project:mainfrom
Afsoon:refactor-pattern-expect-fns
Apr 13, 2026
Merged

feat(linter/jest): share common pattern expect functions#21376
camc314 merged 1 commit intooxc-project:mainfrom
Afsoon:refactor-pattern-expect-fns

Conversation

@Afsoon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Afsoon Afsoon commented Apr 13, 2026

Follow up #21372

@Afsoon Afsoon requested a review from camc314 as a code owner April 13, 2026 09:57
@github-actions github-actions Bot added A-linter Area - Linter C-enhancement Category - New feature or request labels Apr 13, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@camc314 camc314 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@camc314 camc314 changed the title feat(linter): Pattern expect functions as common fn in jest feat(linter/jest): Pattern expect functions as common fn in jest Apr 13, 2026
@camc314 camc314 changed the title feat(linter/jest): Pattern expect functions as common fn in jest feat(linter/jest): share common pattern expect functions Apr 13, 2026
@camc314 camc314 self-assigned this Apr 13, 2026
@camc314 camc314 merged commit 94a32b9 into oxc-project:main Apr 13, 2026
27 checks passed
@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented Apr 13, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 4 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 47 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing Afsoon:refactor-pattern-expect-fns (d6c3678) with main (bab5c31)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 47 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-linter Area - Linter C-enhancement Category - New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants