Skip to content

Conversation

@airween
Copy link
Member

@airween airween commented Jan 30, 2024

No description provided.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@airween airween merged commit d648a44 into owasp-modsecurity:v3/master Jan 30, 2024
@liudongmiao
Copy link
Contributor

I don't know why I didn't make a pr, even make a issue. However, our version is patched in 2022:

// It's patched just the use of path_info.

--- src/transaction.cc  2022-03-19 13:59:14.000000000 +0800
+++ /tmp/transaction.cc 2024-02-02 17:46:05.000000000 +0800
@@ -463,6 +463,14 @@ int Transaction::processURI(const char *

     size_t pos_raw_query = uri_s.find("?");

+    std::string path_info_raw;
+    if (pos_raw_query == std::string::npos) {
+        path_info_raw = std::string(uri_s, 0);
+    } else {
+        path_info_raw = std::string(uri_s, 0, pos_raw_query);
+    }
+    std::string path_info = utils::uri_decode(path_info_raw);
+
     m_uri_decoded = utils::uri_decode(uri_s);

     size_t var_size = pos_raw_query;
@@ -477,14 +485,6 @@ int Transaction::processURI(const char *
     m_variableRequestProtocol.set("HTTP/" + std::string(http_version),
         m_variableOffset + requestLine.size() + 1);

-
-    std::string path_info;
-    if (pos_raw_query == std::string::npos) {
-        path_info = std::string(uri_s, 0);
-    } else {
-        path_info = std::string(uri_s, 0, pos_raw_query);
-    }
-    path_info = utils::uri_decode(path_info);
     m_uri_no_query_string_decoded = std::unique_ptr<std::string>(
             new std::string(path_info));

@@ -496,6 +496,7 @@ int Transaction::processURI(const char *

Should I review all our changes, and try to make PR or issue?

@airween
Copy link
Member Author

airween commented Feb 2, 2024

I don't know why I didn't make a pr, even make a issue. However, our version is patched in 2022:

Well, there are a few of us who walk this path :)

Should I review all our changes, and try to make PR or issue?

Sure, let's see and discuss it. Also, there is a channel on OWASP's Slack where you can join to - the name is #project-modsecurity.

@Rayhutch7007

This comment was marked as spam.

@marcstern marcstern added the 3.x Related to ModSecurity version 3.x label Aug 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3.x Related to ModSecurity version 3.x

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants