-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 917
Improve processing speed with parallel streams #2196
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
PR welcomeNot maintainer's priority to do but will accept contributions!Not maintainer's priority to do but will accept contributions!good first issueGood issues for new contributors to work onGood issues for new contributors to work onhacktoberfestIssues we're happy for new #Hacktoberfest2020 participants to doIssues we're happy for new #Hacktoberfest2020 participants to doperformanceSpeeding up OSHI or reducing memory footprintSpeeding up OSHI or reducing memory footprintup for grabsIssues the maintainers want community help withIssues the maintainers want community help with
Description
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
PR welcomeNot maintainer's priority to do but will accept contributions!Not maintainer's priority to do but will accept contributions!good first issueGood issues for new contributors to work onGood issues for new contributors to work onhacktoberfestIssues we're happy for new #Hacktoberfest2020 participants to doIssues we're happy for new #Hacktoberfest2020 participants to doperformanceSpeeding up OSHI or reducing memory footprintSpeeding up OSHI or reducing memory footprintup for grabsIssues the maintainers want community help withIssues the maintainers want community help with
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
While doing some benchmarking on the FFM project I realized there are many places in OSHI that can benefit from simply adding
parallel()to existing streams, particularly in the getProcess implementations.This is a relatively simple code change with a potentially big payoff.